Mesothelioma Lawyer News

Loading...

Friday, May 30, 2008

Mesothelioma Statistics – Mesothelioma - Asbestos

If you check out the numbers in mesothelioma statistics, there's a good chance that you'll be astonished. Not only are the number of cases on the rise, the medical costs are exorbitant as well.

Mesothelioma Statistics - Know Your Numbers
Learning more about mesothelioma statistics can be helpful in understanding just how serious this condition can be. Even today, a large number of people are working in unsafe environments, totally unaware of the risks involved. By the time they contract this fatal disease, it is usually too late to do anything.

So who is at risk?
mesothelioma statistics show that people who work in the labor sector or in different industries are at the highest risk. The top four riskiest occupations are railroads, manufacturing, automotive industry and shipyards. The riskiest occupation of them all is the construction business, with nearly 1.3 million people being exposed to deadly asbestos every year.

Mesothelioma statistics also show that the disease affects more men than women. The most predominant are men aged fifty to seventy and this is probably due to the fact that the symptoms of mesothelioma take a while to show. Men who were first exposed to asbestos when they were in their twenties will only experience the effects when they are in their fifties or sixties. Recent studies have shown that due to secondary exposure, men in their thirties and forties are also contracting mesothelioma.

And exactly how big a problem is it? Mesothelioma statistics show that nearly 3000 people are newly diagnosed with the disease every year. About 80% of all cases were found to be directly linked to asbestos exposure. Once diagnosed, patients have as little as two to three years to live, with 230,000 people dying from this disease every year. The medical costs can be as high as $800,000 and there is no cure. If you have mesothelioma, it's important to meet a lawyer as soon as possible to build your compensation case.

0 comments: